helbringer
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2015
Should we make raids harder or keep them blizzlike?
What does the word 'blizzlike' mean? How should i answer the question if i want the raids to be harder AND conform to my own definition of the word 'blizzlike'?
There's no reason to have own definitions. It's a rather easy definition. Scripting the game so it technically works like it did in retail vanilla.
Now, difficulty for players being inexperienced noobs and their behaviour and things like that are impossible to simulate. We can't control peoples minds. So it's unreasonable to consider the human aspect part of the 'Blizzlike' term.
Patch 1.5.0 (2005-06-07):
Patch 1.4.0 (2005-05-05): Ragnaros now stays up 2 hours rather than 1 after being summoned.
- The eruptions from the lava in Ragnaros's Lair will now always happen while Ragnaros is in combat. However, these lava eruptions occur less frequently, do less damage, and the damage they inflict is now resistible.
- The maximum range of the Wrath of Ragnaros spell has been increased.
The other interpretation I've seen has been that Blizzlike is the feeling of vanilla WoW (which also gives twisted justification to difficulty buffing, queue and respec changes to spice up PvP and such), to which I provided counterargument because it's not rational.
All I can see the definition I gave of Blizzlike still stands. [...] It's not my definition.
I doubt you believe yourself that elite players were born elite and wouldn't clear the place faster now.
Nor does it surprise me that you misspelt 'surprise'.
Why is it not rational?
You may try to spin it any way you want, but at the end of the day, it is YOUR definition of 'blizzlike'. There is no dictionary definition of this word. There is no agreement from the majority of the private server community upon the definition of that word.
I doubt you believe that playing EverQuest is the same as being born.
I honestly don't get it why you're so angry at Lharts, Qiyn.
Well of course it's "my" definition. If I say Blizzlike means shaved dogs, then it's also my definition by same rule. We can but probably shouldn't get all philosophical about this.
I doubt you believe yourself that elite players were born elite and wouldn't clear the place faster now.
For a smart, decent guy, this is just utter retardese garbage.
I don't understand why can't we use the term when it itself is the subject of the topic. For fucks sake you are using it in an argument.
This is not how language works.
Everyone understands the meaning in a given context, Blizzlike meaning easy raids in this thread for example.
I didn't say anyone has agreed on anything.
I said 'blizzlike' has no place in constructing a logical argument.
This is indeed how language works. We cannot have a discussion unless we have a tacit agreement on the meanings of the words we use.
You make the argument that all WoW private server community players acknowledge the definition you provide.