Nost numbers are trustworthy, I've done my own censuses before Kronos even launched and the whole idea of faked numbers started to spread by the hand of fanboys and haters. Results were basically matching. There's absolutely no element to support your claim, on the other hand compare Ironforge Commons on Kronos and Nost during peak time. Swearing that black is white is pointless.
Your WARcraft copypasta has been all over the place, I believe I read that in at least 5-6 distinct posts of yours, your thought about PvEers is clear... it can basically be summed up in "I like a PvP realm. You don't. Kronos is PvP so deal with it".
I started to participate in this thread before yourself did, and again you're trying to make it something personal. Boring indeed.
Then either you didn't pay attention or you skipped it altogether. I basically said that if their PvE realm will show the same turnout it had during tests (1.7k players), that'd be more PvEers than Kronos current peak of 1.1k despite PvP tagged. How can you call that a dead horse, honestly, is beyond me. You could say that it's soon to tell, that we need to wait and see how it will actually come along, and I'd agree on that. But jumping to conclusions and dismissing things before they're even tested, it's very risky.
It's not an indicator, it's THE indicator. I played on ED when it was fresh and peaking at 400 players per faction, seen it grow to 2.3k online peak, watched it drop to its current state where less than 100 players are ever on (dead). Are those servers you mentioned 1x vanilla with no custom rates nor p2w features? Do they cater to the same players? In a competitive environment like the vanilla scene is, population makes the difference. Nost can afford losing 500 players per faction to its upcoming realm, take that number from Kronos and you'd get very close to kill it, hence why we can't open a new realm, can't counter their move and can't contain the wave of Kronos PvEers that are going to try it out.
It's not "somewhere", it's a sticky topic :tongue:
Your WARcraft copypasta has been all over the place, I believe I read that in at least 5-6 distinct posts of yours, your thought about PvEers is clear... it can basically be summed up in "I like a PvP realm. You don't. Kronos is PvP so deal with it".
U don't have to come on every thread and seek me out to try and argue with me, srsly it's getting old.
I started to participate in this thread before yourself did, and again you're trying to make it something personal. Boring indeed.
The rest of what you're saying is pure speculation and repeating your dead horse idea with different words.
Then either you didn't pay attention or you skipped it altogether. I basically said that if their PvE realm will show the same turnout it had during tests (1.7k players), that'd be more PvEers than Kronos current peak of 1.1k despite PvP tagged. How can you call that a dead horse, honestly, is beyond me. You could say that it's soon to tell, that we need to wait and see how it will actually come along, and I'd agree on that. But jumping to conclusions and dismissing things before they're even tested, it's very risky.
population is not an indicator of a realm's long term longevity.
It's not an indicator, it's THE indicator. I played on ED when it was fresh and peaking at 400 players per faction, seen it grow to 2.3k online peak, watched it drop to its current state where less than 100 players are ever on (dead). Are those servers you mentioned 1x vanilla with no custom rates nor p2w features? Do they cater to the same players? In a competitive environment like the vanilla scene is, population makes the difference. Nost can afford losing 500 players per faction to its upcoming realm, take that number from Kronos and you'd get very close to kill it, hence why we can't open a new realm, can't counter their move and can't contain the wave of Kronos PvEers that are going to try it out.
Nost IS shitty for many reasons, i even made a post about it that went into detail and there's an even more in depth post on the forums somewhere too.
It's not "somewhere", it's a sticky topic :tongue:
Last edited by a moderator: