Psojed
Authorized
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2009
well and perhaps i am thinking a bit too deep :wink:
That's why I ended the discussion at the start of the page 7 :yes:
well and perhaps i am thinking a bit too deep :wink:
Well, i can say, that i'm fine with multiboxing and as i've stated in other threads, i don't see a reason to not allow it. Maybe some regulation should be done, but not forbiding it.
You might change your mind when you're going for a mining/herb node and suddenly get insta killed by a multi-boxer who wants that same node. Against a regular player you'll have a chance to fight it out, but bend over and take it, cuz there's nothing you can do against a multi-boxer. :tongue:
If the devs want a healthy server, they won't allow these forms of cheating.
My conclusion is that while the first kind of multiboxer is harmless to the server, he is also useless, he does nothing to make the server better or worse, whereas the second kind actively disrupts server economy and PvP balance and in worst case he may result in contributing players quitting the server and thus he may actively also disrupt server population.
I personally would feel very disheartened by being beat out at something by a multiboxer. I would feel like I myself had to multibox in order to compete and would probably just get overwhelmed/annoyed and quit. There weren't THAT many multiboxers on live because paying for 5 active subscriptions added up, here it is free so it could EASILY get out of control. I really hope multiboxing becomes a bannable offense. It quite simply would cheapen the server and would not feel like a true blizzlike vanilla experience.
your logic here doesn't hold up to critical thinking. this is pretty much like saying you want to quit working because other people are doing more and better work even though it doesn't affect you directly. grass is always greener argument.
people aren't going to quit or avoid this server just because pve multiboxing is allowed, to claim this is quite frankly brainfarting and doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
Nope, because in your example there is no 'cheating' involved, if you see someone doing your work faster or better it's an incentive to better yourself, to achieve the same results as you see someone else doing.
The same applies to multiboxing, if you see someone doing what you do (farming materials, gearing up for raids etc.) and doing it better than you it provides an incentive to reach that level of mastery, if you see a multiboxer doing that, then you have to multibox to have any hopes of reaching the level of mastery that the multiboxer has.
Well, one thing - in many threads, everyone complain, that they want 100% blizzlike server without any modifications - On retail, owner of multiple accs can multibox
Yes but on retail the game costs and you pay a monthly subscription for each so if you want it to be as close to 100% and especially regarding multibox then you would have to include those also which you cannot since anything except donation is highly illegal.
there will always be a compromise and you cannot get it 100% since blizzard stealth changed and fixed many things in the game which either cannot be found or proven anymore, and since it is a private server and not blizzard they cannot claim it to be 100% blizzlike unless blizzard gives their consent.
but they can get really close to it.
the issue on private server's is that they cannot add the prize, and the creators allowed it for the mere fact of cash which automatically reduced the number who would do it.if you wanted to control multiple chars at once and had the money to do it
you will once you play on servers like ED from Feenix where it is an open/clear issue when farming or just walking around, it is a matter of equality which forces others if they want to be competitive to do the same.
also as you so finely said
the issue on private server's is that they cannot add the prize, and the creators allowed it for the mere fact of cash which automatically reduced the number who would do it.
fifth. IT WAS ALLOWED. it is not cheating. IT WAS ALLOWED BY THE CREATORS. this one goes to Figaro.
No matter how you change the line, no matter which words you choose, IT WAS ALLOWED BACK THEN.
.